Why Manual Testing can never die in Software Testing?
Is Automation Taking Our Jobs? Not Quite Yet, and Manual Testing Will Always Remain Vital.

In the age of automation, a common fear that lurks in the hearts of manual software testers is, are we becoming obsolete? With AI-powered testing tools emerging like clockwork, it’s easy to imagine a future where manual testing becomes a relic of the past. But hold on to your test cases, fellow testers! While automation brings undeniable benefits, the reason why manual testing remains an irreplaceable partner in the fight for high-quality software is,

The Uncanny Valley of User Experience (UX)

Imagine a virtual assistant that flawlessly completes tasks but delivers greetings in a monotone, emotionless voice. That’s the uncanny valley of UX – a point where automation becomes technically impressive but fails to feel human. Software interfaces are rarely one-size-fits-all. What feels intuitive to a tech-savvy user might leave a novice lost in the woods. Manual testers, with their ability to think outside the box, can explore unconventional user journeys (use cases) and uncover usability issues that automation might miss.

Example: Remember Clippy, the overly enthusiastic paperclip from Microsoft Office? While automation flawlessly inserted paperclips into documents, it lacked the human touch to understand when a paperclip wasn’t actually needed. Manual testers can identify situations where automation might go overboard, ensuring a more intuitive and user-friendly experience.

The Thrill of the Hunt: Exploratory Testing

In any software, it isn’t a linear path from point A to point B. Think of it as a sprawling digital jungle. Exploratory testing is like being a digital Indiana Jones, venturing off the beaten path and uncovering hidden functionalities and edge cases. Imagine a complex e-commerce website. Automation might flawlessly test the typical checkout process, but a manual tester, exploring the “forgotten items” section or trying unusual combinations of products, might discover a critical bug in the order processing system.

Adaptability to Change

In today’s fast-paced development environment, software undergoes frequent changes and updates. While automated tests offer efficiency and speed, they often struggle to keep pace with evolving software requirements. Conversely, manual testing excels at adapting to changes on the fly. Consider a scenario where a last-minute change is made to the login process of a banking application. Automated tests might fail, requiring time-consuming updates to test scripts. In contrast, manual testers can quickly adjust their testing approach, verifying the new login flow and ensuring its seamless integration with the rest of the application. Their adaptability makes manual testing invaluable in agile environments where change is constant.

Real-World Heroics: Thinking Beyond the Code

Almost any functional software doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It interacts with other systems, databases, and ultimately, real people. Manual testers bring a holistic perspective to the table. They can consider real user workflows and test for scenarios that go beyond the isolated functionalities that automation often focuses on. For instance, a manual tester might discover that a seemingly unrelated change in the login process disrupts user authentication across multiple systems, a nuance that automated scripts might not be designed to catch.

The Unbreakable Spirit: Breaking the System (Safely and Ethically!)

Great testers are like digital detectives, constantly on the lookout for ways to break the system… in a controlled environment, of course! They leverage their creativity to devise unconventional test cases that push the software to its limits. Imagine a banking application. Automation might flawlessly test standard transactions, but a manual tester, thinking like a determined hacker, might try entering nonsensical account numbers or manipulating data in unexpected ways, uncovering potential vulnerabilities that could have devastating consequences if left unchecked.

The All-Seeing Eye: The Power of Human Observation

 Let’s be honest, automation can mimic user actions with impressive accuracy, but it lacks the discerning eye of a human tester. Visual inconsistencies, grammatical errors, or other UI imperfections can often slip past automated tests but are easily spotted by a trained manual tester. Think of a social media platform where automated scripts might successfully post updates, but a manual tester might notice a visual glitch that disrupts the layout or a typo in a crucial error message.

The Winning Duo: Automation and Manual Testing

The truth is, that automation and manual testing aren’t locked in a battle royale. They’re powerful partners in the software testing process. Automation excels at repetitive tasks, freeing up manual testers to focus on the creative, strategic aspects of testing. Imagine a tireless robot army efficiently handling regression testing of core functionalities, while a squad of skilled manual testers explores the uncharted territories of the software, ensuring a comprehensive and high-quality testing experience.

The Future is Bright (and Human): The Evolving Role of Manual Testing

So, the next time someone asks if manual testing is on its deathbed, you can confidently assure them that the human touch will always be an essential part of building exceptional software. As automation continues to evolve, the role of manual testers will likely shift towards higher-level thinking and strategic planning. Imagine testers leveraging automation tools to create self-healing test suites or collaborating with developers to design more testable software from the ground up.

The future of software testing lies not in replacing humans with machines, but in harnessing the power of both to create a robust and user-friendly digital experience. So, dust off your test plans and sharpen your critical thinking skills, fellow testers! The automation scripts might be here to stay, but the future of software quality is still very much in human hands.


In conclusion, while automation testing has transformed the way software is tested and delivered, manual testing is still an important part of the testing process. Human beings provide testers with the ability to think critically and imaginatively, allowing them to identify issues that automated tests may miss. Manual testing promotes adaptation and intuition, guaranteeing that the finished product satisfies the highest quality requirements. So, despite technological developments, the need for manual testing in software testing should never be ignored. To get the greatest outcomes from your software development initiatives, combine manual and automated testing.

Upskill Yourself
Consult Us